This is the official website of Travis County, Texas.

On This Site

Commissioners Court

Previous Years' Agendas

Intergovernmental Relations Office

Administrative Ops

Health & Human Svcs

Criminal_Justice

Planning & Budget

Transportation & Natural Resources
 

On Other Sites

Travis County Commssioners Court
June 15, 2004

The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.

Item 4

View captioned video.

Number 4 is a public hearing to discuss request regarding a plat for recording in precinct three: king's village, resubdivision of lot 46 (short form plat - 2 lots - 2.98 acres - howard lane - no fiscal required - sewage service provided by city of Austin - city of Austin limited regarding.
>> this is actually precinct 2.
>> 2.
>> this is precinct 2, Sonleitner not daughterty, everything else is --
>> move to open the public hearing.
>> second.
>> all in favor. That passes by unanimous vote.
>> carol joseph, t.n.r. Yes, we apologize, this was posted in the wrong precinct. However, it's a simple -- simple final plat of two commercial lots. We have no issues other than the fact that we would ask that you approve it now and we will -- we will come back and repost the -- the action and ratify the action. Next week. To make it precinct 2.
>> [indiscernible] indicate the wrong Commissioner's name. We never said it was in precinct 3, we just indicated Daugherty.
>> it does say 3. [multiple voices]
>> recording in precinct 3.
>> it does say precinct 3?
>> yes.
>> okay. Sorry. Would anyone like to give testimony during this public hearing? If so please come forward, item no. 4.
>> although Commissioner Daugherty thought [indiscernible] I would move that the public hearing be closed.
>> second.
>> so the recommendation on 4 is that under item 12 we approve it, but then come back next week and ratify the correct precinct.
>> and Commissioner.
>> in order to be closer to perfection.
>> all right.
>> all in favor of the motion to close the public hearing? That passes by unanimous vote.


Last Modified: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:02 AM