Travis County Commssioners Court
May 11, 2004
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Consent Items
Posted for consent are c 1 through c 7. And I show those to be ready for action, c 1 through c 7. We have been asked to -- to add the following items to the consent motion, if you would like for us to discuss these separately. Please say so as we call out the number of the item. Number 5, 6, 7, 8 b, is anybody here on number 8? 8 a we pulled, be back later on 8 b on consent. 9 a and b. 10, 11, 12, 14,.
>> judge we need to have assurances that this was passed by the Pflugerville city council last night, 13 and 14 are linked together, depend debit on action by Pflugerville, we need joe to tell us it indeed happened last night.
>> 14 will not be part of the consent motion.
>> thank you.
>> we will call 15 up soon, ms. Walker. 17, I do need an explanation there, there's a $116,000 difference, I need a staff recommendation after the explanation, 22, 23, that's the current employee, there's a workers' comp issue there. Those actions, the last one will leave them in the same position. That looked a whole lot more routine actually when we get all of the facts. Any objection to 23 being part of the consent motion? 26 a and b, 27, 29 a and b and on 29 c, the exhibit a that I have in the backup doesn't really clearly show these two. If they are part of exhibit a that's fine. I can clearly see the a and b, central accounting station and receiving substations, I’m having a hard time finding an attachment that was something for c, I don't know whether I’m missing it or not. If the county clerk's office will let us know. Right now 29 a and b. We will come back to c if we get some input from them. 33, and 33 is the last one.
>> move approval of the consent items.
>> second.
>> would anyone like for us to pull any of these items for separate discussion?
>> judge, let me ask the question. Since we are putting 17 on consent, I need to make sure that we are doing the right thing on this, somebody guide me. We -- we basically gave joe comments last week and read them before campo last night, and I know that I had an issue with -- I voted against that last week. Should I ask that -- that that not be on consent?
>> actually, we can just indicate that you still vote no.
>> you still vote no as part of the consent.
>> that would be on that today, assuming that you support all of the others, just show 17 Commissioner Daugherty voting against it. So it would be 17 that would be just the 3-1 and one absent.
>> okay.
>> do -- did we vote on the others?
>> [indiscernible] [inaudible - no mic]
>> 5 or a 1.
>> 5.
>> 5 will not be part of the consent motion, we will pull it off. Call it up next. Actually, let's just pull 17 out, also.
>> [indiscernible]
>> the reason for that is that we were hoping that would approve, you or someone sign those, back if they were in the form without any changes so that it wouldn't have to come back to court when each of the entities signed it. If you want to put that into the consent that's fine, it's just not shown on the [indiscernible] agenda.
>> all right. Let's have a separate motion on 26. So we are pulling out 5, 26, and 17. Any objection to any of the other that's we called out being part of the consent motion? You have all of the others? All in favor? That passes by unanimous vote.
Last Modified: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:23 AM