Travis County Commssioners Court
April 27, 2004
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Consent Items
The consent items are next. And posted for consent are c 1 through c 3, and would anyone like for us to discuss any of those separately, c 1 through c 3? And let's consider adding the following items to the consent motion, if you would like for us to pull any of these for separate discussion, say so as we call out the number. Number 3, number 4, 11, 11 a and b, 12, 13, 14, 15 --
>> do we need to make sure the budget amendments are also in this one because it's contingent on budget amendments t 5 and t 6.
>> I'm assuming we're going to do those.
>> okay.
>> I know there are no issues.
>> sometimes the audio store's office likes things in a certain order.
>> make sure we get it done before the meeting is over.
>> not a problem.
>> that meanings within the next 30 seconds, I believe.
>> I'm hoping so.
>> 16, all of 17, so that will be 17 a through 17 h, 18, 21, that we had the public hearing on, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, now, that is not the city of Austin providing the sewage service, that is Travis County m.u.d. Number 3 and 4.
>> woe can have that on. That's just for informational purposes. Many descriptions of the plat is [indiscernible]
>> okay. Sewage service be provided by Travis County m.u.d. Number 3 and 4. 29 a, b and c, 30.
>> we are done. [laughter]
>> that was long, but I think that's --
>> there's the money for the other one. Got it. Okay. 31, one last one.
>> 33?
>> I think somebody is coming down for a short presentation on that one.
>> move approval for consent items.
>> judge, did we do 19? That was a low bid.
>> oh, no.
>> on 19, I have one or two questions about that one. We got an e-mail that sort of answers them. Would anyone like for us to pull any of these items for separate discussion? All in favor? That passes by unanimous vote.
Last Modified: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 9:46 AM