Travis County Commssioners Court
February 3, 2004
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Item 26
26 is to consider and take appropriate action on the following requests: a, interlocal agreement between Travis County and the city of Austin for the relocation and adjustment of existing city of Austin water utility main and apurt nenss with the anderson mill road cip project. And 26-b, request for modification number 4 to Travis County's professional contract agreement number o 15 e 601-jj with carter and burr jesse, incorporated for the design of the anderson mill road cip project. Do you have something on 26 a and b?
>> we have the contract. We have to -- we have the signed modification. I don't see it?
>> my note says there's nothing in the background to cover that. Nothing in the backup, rather.
>> to cover the modification?
>> 26-b. My note says no backup. Do ou have a copy of whatever -- is that mine or is that 26-a?
>> this is just interlocal.
>> is c in there?
>> that's what I'm looking for.
>> is this pause it's requested as request for modification number 4 that you're basically asking for permission so that we can move it on to purchasing to appropriately put it back on here on the negotiated modification?
>> as far as I know, yes. I don't think that they wouladd that to their modification. It would come back --
>> i've got cyd grimes on the phone right now. Is this just to be requesting the mod and have the true mod back on next week's agenda.
>> okay.
>> what do we need to know about a?
>> other than the city is paying for the entire relocation, nothing. I mean, it's part of our cip project, and we need that relocation to be able to complete the design and the construction of anderson mill.
>> this has been taking a lot of time and coordination with the city of Austin related to the water line underneath the roadway and trying to figure out -- and it not there, then where does it go? So it's at long last figured out.
>> second.
>> move approval. Iks 26-b -- 26-b, I guess we've approved the request for the modification to be provided next week?
>> that would -- (indiscernible).
>> any more discussion? All in favor? That passes by unanimous vote. Thank you very much.
Last Modified: Wednesday, February 4, 2004 6:25 AM