Travis County Commssioners Court
December 2, 2003
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Consent Items
The consent items are next. Posted for consent are c 1 through c 4. C 1 through c 4. We have been asked to consider adding the following items to the consent motion: we do have a long list of them. If you would like for us to discuss any of these separately please say so as we call out the number of the item. Number 2, 3, 5, he shoulds on 5, there are a -- issues on 5 there are a whole lot but --
>> cleanup.
>> 7.
>> I need to register a no.
>> okay. Number 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
>> I have a question on 14.
>> 14 will not be part of the consent position.
>> 15, I'm assuming that that money will remain in the account on number 15 as I know each subcontractor has a claim in that matter, we have been working with for quite some time now, we need to bring that to a head soon, probably to the Commissioners court.
>> 15 and 16 really are linked.
>> 16, 17, 18 with this being modification, change order number 4 instead of number 3.
>> number 3, right.
>> change order number 4 instead of 3. On 18. 19, 20, 21, 22 a and b, 27, backing up, any issues on 26?
>> no.
>> no.
>> huh-uh.
>> 26 and 27, 28 a and b.
>> I have a question on b.
>> 28 b will not be part of the consent motion, but 28 will. Unless there's objection. 29, any issues on 30? Ms. Price has indicated a willingness to serve again.
>> doing a great job.
>> great job.
>> 30, 31, 32, 33, 35 --
>> judge, I have a quick thing on 35.
>> 35 will not be part of the consent motion. That means the last one is 33.
>> okay.
>> would anyone like for us to pull any of these for separate discussion.
>> move approval.
>> did we not have 23, judge? It's a [indiscernible] Commissioner Daugherty?
>> 23. That was -- no. 23 is fine with me.
>> okay.
>> okay. We are adding 23.
>> okay.
>> okay. Motion and second. Any more discussion? All in favor? That passes by unanimous vote.
Last Modified: Tuesday, December 3, 2003 6:52 AM