This is the official website of Travis County, Texas.

On This Site

Commissioners Court

Previous Years' Agendas

Intergovernmental Relations Office

Administrative Ops

Health & Human Svcs

Criminal_Justice

Planning & Budget

Transportation & Natural Resources
 

On Other Sites

Travis County Commssioners Court
December 2, 2003

The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.

Item 28

View captioned video.

28-d, there was a question about, and that is a grant plan change to the district attorney's title 4-e legal services contract with the Texas department and protective and regulatory services. Should be Texas department of protective services. This changes the maximum amount payable from $202,668 to $229,031.
>> do I understand that this program has been going on for, what, three years?
>> sir, we have been getting reimbursement for this program since 1996. What it is is the civil unit in the district attorney's office acts as the attorneys for the department of protective and regulatory services. And it's mandated by the family code. And this is federal -- partial federal reimbursement for the expenses of the district attorney's office in that representation. And it turns out to be about a quarter of the expenses that we get back.
>> but our local match is 35%?
>> no, sir, there's no match. We pay for the total cost of the program. And through this federal program, we get about 25% of Travis County's costs back.
>> it's really a reimbursement.
>> again, and vicky, I guess I'm confused whenever I read in the backup and for the fourth year the grant series the federal rules require a 35% local match.
>> that's --
>> is that a -- which is 65% local match, 72, which is 35%.
>> I believe that's another program.
>> that's the other grant. That's the county attorney underaged drinking prevention program. That's 28-a. Not 28-b.
>> 28-a.
>> and they've already got it budgeted so we are basically using existing budgeted resource to be the match.
>> is 35% an unusually large match?
>> no, not at all. As the federal government gets tighter with their money, they increase the match requirements, and a lot of federal grant programs, if it's multi-year program, they start you off with a real sweet deal of zero match or 10% match, and every year they increase the match and a lot of them in the fourth year or beyond it's 50% match. Some of them they try to wean you off completely and they want the local government to pay for all the costs of the program and keep it going.
>> and I'm sorry I had confused you all because in a we signed off on and I highlighted b pwurbgts what I really meant to highlight was b which is the reason I was asking about the program. But you just answered the question so thank you.
>> move approval.
>> second.
>> of 28-b, right?
>> uh-huh.
>> any more discussion? All in favor? That passes by unanimous vote. Thank you all very much. And keep it going.


Last Modified: Tuesday, December 3, 2003 6:52 AM