Travis County Commssioners Court
October 14, 2003
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Consent Items
Now, next are the consent items. And posted for consent are c 1 through c 3, and those are ready. We have been asked to -- to consider adding the following items to the consent motion. And if you would like for us to discuss these separately, please say so as we call out the number of the item. Number 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
>> judge, on 11 the city of Austin September an e-mail after t.n.r. Submitted their backup on this. The amount of the contract needs to change from $3,746,878 to $3,753,033, all that increase is being footed by the city of Austin.
>> it's all city of Austin.
>> all city of Austin.
>> consent.
>> yeah.
>> our dollar amounts stays the same.
>> yeah.
>> so you will make the necessary change for the interlocal.
>> yes.
>> did you pick up that number? With that change any objection to adding 11 to the consent motion?
>> no.
>> 12 a and b.
>> judge, I never got the backup on 12 a and b.
>> 12 a and b will not be part of the consent motion. 13? 16, 17 c, t and e -- 17 c, d and e, 17 we are pulling a and b as previously announced.
>> uh-huh. 19, by the way we have been asked to call up item no. 18 after 10:45 to give the county auditor an opportunity to appear to that item.
>> [inaudible - no mic]
>> the county auditor is here. [laughter] so --
>> traffic was [inaudible - no mic]
>> that's okay. 19 is what I called out, right?
>> uh-huh.
>> 20?
>> judge, I have questions on 20 that --
>> 20 will be --
>> pops scale [multiple voices]
>> 22, 25, there was a funding ir, a question on -- a funding issue, a question on 24, if we can get that cleared up that may be routine. 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 35.
>> move approval.
>> second.
>> would anyone like for us to pull any of these items for separate discussion? All in favor of the motion? That passes by unanimous vote.
Last Modified: Tuesday, October 15, 2003 12:52 PM