Travis County Commssioners Court
June 17, 2003
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Item 2
2. Discuss the partial vacation of lot f9 and a plat for recording in precinct three: resubdivision of the south portion of lot f9, northwest hills ranch, section one (short form plat - 4 lots - 2.835 acres - d-k ranch road and t-bar trail - no fiscal required - sewage service to be provided by city of Austin, city of Austin e.t.j.
>> move that the public hearing be opened.
>> second.
>> all in favor? That passes by unanimous vote.
>> good morning, carol joseph, t.n.r. This -- this request of this plat was originally platted in 1965. The re-- resubwided in 1989. At that time, there was a plat restriction -- no vehicular access from the lot f 9, batch 2, I'm sorry, to bee cave ranch. The developer is now coming into resubdivide again, lot f 9-2 into four different lots and they need access from bee cave ranch. What they are asking is a vacation of that prohibition on the access from bee cave ranch. We are asking that the action item, however, on number 5 be pulled until the city has approved the plat. The city has not done that. We expect it to happen within the next couple of weeks.
>> okay. Alternatively, we have asked by lee heckman to approve the plat for recording at the time that the city of Austin approves it.
>> we could do either/or. Normally what we do is we wait until the city has approved the -- their plats and then we rerecord --
>> can we do the second one, tom, is that legality if.
>> you can do a conditional approval.
>> that second one will keep you from coming back. We know how busy your schedule is so -- [laughter]
>> whatever works. We will do conditional approval on the 5.
>> okay. But --
>> is that administrative that it's having to work its way through the city, through the z.a.p. Or planning commission as opposed to the council because the council is not meeting for a month.
>> right. It's the zoning committee and apparently was scheduling issue that occurred -- [multiple voices]
>> almost every week.
>> yes.
>> thank you.
>> would anyone like to give testimony during this public hearing.
>> move that the public hearing be closed. Second.
>> that passes by unanimous vote. That will be action item no. 5.
Last Modified: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:52 AM