Travis County Commssioners Court
May 27, 2003
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Consent Items
Consent items are next. Posted for consent c 1 through c 7, and I show those to be ready for action.
>> uh-huh.
>> we have been asked to consider adding the following items to the consent motion, if you would like for us to discuss any of these separately, please say so as we call out the number. Number 5, 6, 7, it's a little different there but -- kind of urgent and we wanted our people to meet with the five applicants throughout the day, show them different county projects, facilities and to keep it together, we thought that the leaat we could do is buy them lunch, that's what that's about. Number 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 30.
>> judge, I have a couple of -- [indiscernible] on 15 and --
>> all right. Neither one of those will be part of the consent motion. 15 and 30 will not be part of the consent motion.
>> yeah.
>> 16, that we had the public hearing on, as well as 17.
>> right. 18, 20 a and b, 22, 23, 24, 25 a and b, 27, 28, 29, 30. 30, 36 --
>> judge, I'm sorry, I thought Commissioner Davis said he wanted to have a comment on that --
>> yeah, I'm sorry, he did. 30 is not part of the consent motion. 36, 38, that is -- 38 is the last one.
>> how about 34? At was all in the budget and just trying to --
>> there's one discussion item.
>> christian says do not put on consent.
>> yeah.
>> I move approval of the consent items.
>> second.
>> would aone like for us to pull any of these items for separate discussion? Christian did not say do not put on consent, christian said please do not put this on consent. [laughter]
>> it would be --
>> all in gave? That passes by unanimous vote.
Last Modified: Wednesday, May 27, 2003 7:52 PM