Travis County Commssioners Court
January 21, 2003
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Item 47
47 is to discuss board and committee assignments for commissioners court members and take appropriate action. Normally in January we look at our court -- our committee assignments and try to figure out whether we want to change them. And I put this on for us to at allergy forecast make a decision. Do we want to look at the list and maybe suggest some changes?
>> yuj, commissioner daugherty and I have already discussed related to the balcones ban onlands and I'm very pleased that he would like to continue serving on that. That would be my recommendation related to the bcp.
>> what we're going to do is take the list to the court and so we can make the changes in writing on there. Did my office get the list out already?
>> yes.
>> my staff is ahead of me.
>> that's why we were going --
>> do we need to think about making changes or leave it to the individual members or what? If we're going to make changes, we'll have it back on next week.
>> I know we've taken care of campo, commissioner daugherty is on there. And he and I agreed that he would serve on that and I would stay on the capital capital metro board.
>> I know that we never did -- when commissioner Moore was here, we did pull her to be on the commuter rail district.
>> that's missing here.
>> let's bring it back next week. How's that? For discussion and action.
>> and did we want to -- as part of our discussions for next week, did we want to formally recognize the rma subcommittee as being an official subcommittee of this court?
>> I don't have a problem with that.
>> we'll have it on the list. How's that?
>> that would be a good way to recognize it.
>> judge, I guess the only thing I'm saying here is the e--- that's the same as e- commerce.
>> it not on the list?
>> it's not, but does it need to be or would this show that he was appointed to it.
>> if you're on there, we need --
>> I'm on there.
>> e-commerce committee.
>> I thought we had two people on there.
>> okay. Stuff like that if you give it to me this week, we'll have all those ready. Okay. Be back on next week.
Last Modified: Wednesday, April 2, 2003 10:25 AM