This is the official website of Travis County, Texas.

On This Site

Commissioners Court

Previous Years' Agendas

Intergovernmental Relations Office

Administrative Ops

Health & Human Svcs

Criminal_Justice

Planning & Budget

Transportation & Natural Resources
 

On Other Sites

Travis County Commssioners Court
October 15, 2002

The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.

Consent Items

View captioned video.

Consents items are next.
>> posted for consent are c 1 through c 7, I show all of them to be ready for action today. We have been asked to recommend the following items, to add the following items to the consent motion. If you would like for us to discuss any of these separately, please say so as we read out the number. Number 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 a and b, 12, a and b, 13 a, b and c, 16, 17 --
>> judge, I have just a brief comments on that one, it won't take long once we get to it.
>> 17 will not be part of the consents motion. 20, a and b. 21 --
>> I have a question on 21, judge.
>> 21 will not be part of the consent motion. 22.
>> do we have to wait on item 14, because it was a budget discussion item related to the awarding of that contract.
>> would you like for us to --
>> I think it would be appropriate for them --
>> 22 will not be part of the consent motion.
>> I'm going to get there --
>> 24. My one question about 23 a and b is whether we have precedence for this.
>> I understand we do, sir.
>> yes.
>> the amount was kind of surprising.
>> [inaudible - no mic] eggs there agreement on that?
>> 23 a and b.
>> I just wanted the record to show -- staff's position on that, right?
>> yes, sir.
>> judge, some of those tracts are very unusual in terms of topography, so it's 24, 25, 26 a and b, 27 a- and b, 28, 30, 31.
>> move approval.
>> second.
>> is there anyone who would like for us to pull any of these items for separate discussion? Hearing none, all in favor? That passes by unanimous vote.


Last Modified: Wednesday, April 2, 2003 10:25 AM