Travis County Commssioners Court
 
October 8, 2002
The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.
Housing Finance Corporation
 Now let's call to order the Travis County housing finance corporation. The 
    first item of business, -- and filing of applications with the Texas bond 
    review board for the following applications and take appropriate action.0oç 
    a, fort branch landing ii located at approximately 5800 north tech any center 
    -- should we take them all together? B is cherry mountain villas located on 
    wild cherry drive. C, tech ridgeville last located approximately one-fourth 
    mile east of interstate 35 between parmer lane and howard lane. And d, shadow 
    apartments located off of gregg manor road just north of gregg manor road 
    and highway 290, manor Texas. 
    >> I’m general counsel to the corporation. Briefly, last 
    week you were delivered a one-page summary as well as a full copy of the application. 
    An inducement resolution and agreement to issue bonds for these potential 
    transactions. This is a reminder, in the past we've -- we get these applications 
    in for these projects to participate in the -- what we call the lottery at 
    the bond review board to obtain an allocation of the state's volume cap every 
    year. As an example, last year we had 21 applications. We've actually closed 
    two transactions this year and the heatherwilde transaction is scheduled to 
    close next week. We've had numerous applications get allocation and then for 
    one reason or another not proceed. This year we only have four as compared 
    to 21 last year. But I don't know if you want me to briefly talk about each 
    one or if the backup was enough. For you all's consideration. 
    >> any questions about the specific ones? 
    >> david sailing with campbell-hogue is here and they are 
    putting in for the fort branch west or fort branch ii. We financed the first 
    phase of that program a couple years ago, and so we have seen that group before 
    and they've done a good job. 
    >> let me add that each applicant in this process paid $2,000 
    of the 11,000 application fee, and we have received the $2,000 from each of 
    the four applicants. 
    >> for further requests? 
    >> yes. 
    >> do we have reason to be optimistic about positive action 
    by the state on these applications? 
    >> what I have heard, at least from local issuers, is that 
    most local issuers, number of applications is down this year which would increase 
    everyone's chances in the lottery process. So we expect there would probably 
    be a smaller number of these particular transactions. The deadline is October 
    18th to file with the bond review board. Until they are all filed, we don't 
    really know. 
    >> so we still need to keep our fingers crossed. 
    >> yes, sir. 
    >> okay. I guess we can all -- take these all together. Same 
    motion, same treatment basically. 
    >> sure. 
    >> same finger crossing. 
    >> yes, sir. 
    >> move approval. 
    >> second. 
    >> any more discussion? Good luck to all the applicants. 
    All in favor. That passes by unanimous vote. Number 2 is to consider payment 
    to any baby can agency and take appropriate action. 
    >> if you will recall, in July of this year, the board approved 
    a contract with any baby can to provide for a $500,000 to be paid in three 
    installments. The first installment is due October 15th for 1 -- for $166,667. 
    And any baby can has submitted an invoice and has complied with all the provisions 
    of the contract. So I do recommend approval of -- and requesting permission 
    to pay the invoice. 
    >> move approval. 
    >> second. 
    >> any reason why this should not be approved? 
    >> not in my opinion. 
    >> any more discussion? All in favor? That passes by unanimous 
    vote. 
    >> move adjourn. 
    >> second. 
    >> all in favor?
 
 That passes by unanimous vote also.
Last Modified: Wednesday, April 2, 2003 10:25 AM
