This is the official website of Travis County, Texas.

On This Site

Commissioners Court

Previous Years' Agendas

Intergovernmental Relations Office

Administrative Ops

Health & Human Svcs

Criminal_Justice

Planning & Budget

Transportation & Natural Resources
 

On Other Sites

Travis County Commssioners Court
October 8, 2002

The Closed Caption log for this Commissioners Court agenda item is provided by Travis County Internet Services. Since this file is derived from the Closed Captions created during live cablecasts, there are occasional spelling and grammatical errors. This Closed Caption log is not an official record the Commissioners Court Meeting and cannot be relied on for official purposes. For official records please contact the County Clerk at (512) 854-4722.

Housing Finance Corporation

View captioned video.

Now let's call to order the Travis County housing finance corporation. The first item of business, -- and filing of applications with the Texas bond review board for the following applications and take appropriate action.0oç a, fort branch landing ii located at approximately 5800 north tech any center -- should we take them all together? B is cherry mountain villas located on wild cherry drive. C, tech ridgeville last located approximately one-fourth mile east of interstate 35 between parmer lane and howard lane. And d, shadow apartments located off of gregg manor road just north of gregg manor road and highway 290, manor Texas.
>> I’m general counsel to the corporation. Briefly, last week you were delivered a one-page summary as well as a full copy of the application. An inducement resolution and agreement to issue bonds for these potential transactions. This is a reminder, in the past we've -- we get these applications in for these projects to participate in the -- what we call the lottery at the bond review board to obtain an allocation of the state's volume cap every year. As an example, last year we had 21 applications. We've actually closed two transactions this year and the heatherwilde transaction is scheduled to close next week. We've had numerous applications get allocation and then for one reason or another not proceed. This year we only have four as compared to 21 last year. But I don't know if you want me to briefly talk about each one or if the backup was enough. For you all's consideration.
>> any questions about the specific ones?
>> david sailing with campbell-hogue is here and they are putting in for the fort branch west or fort branch ii. We financed the first phase of that program a couple years ago, and so we have seen that group before and they've done a good job.
>> let me add that each applicant in this process paid $2,000 of the 11,000 application fee, and we have received the $2,000 from each of the four applicants.
>> for further requests?
>> yes.
>> do we have reason to be optimistic about positive action by the state on these applications?
>> what I have heard, at least from local issuers, is that most local issuers, number of applications is down this year which would increase everyone's chances in the lottery process. So we expect there would probably be a smaller number of these particular transactions. The deadline is October 18th to file with the bond review board. Until they are all filed, we don't really know.
>> so we still need to keep our fingers crossed.
>> yes, sir.
>> okay. I guess we can all -- take these all together. Same motion, same treatment basically.
>> sure.
>> same finger crossing.
>> yes, sir.
>> move approval.
>> second.
>> any more discussion? Good luck to all the applicants. All in favor. That passes by unanimous vote. Number 2 is to consider payment to any baby can agency and take appropriate action.
>> if you will recall, in July of this year, the board approved a contract with any baby can to provide for a $500,000 to be paid in three installments. The first installment is due October 15th for 1 -- for $166,667. And any baby can has submitted an invoice and has complied with all the provisions of the contract. So I do recommend approval of -- and requesting permission to pay the invoice.
>> move approval.
>> second.
>> any reason why this should not be approved?
>> not in my opinion.
>> any more discussion? All in favor? That passes by unanimous vote.
>> move adjourn.
>> second.
>> all in favor?
That passes by unanimous vote also.


Last Modified: Wednesday, April 2, 2003 10:25 AM